Sector report — 2026 edition
Private clinic websites in Jeddah: Arabic nearly everywhere, bookings nobody can trace
We collected 332 clinics from Jeddah's public listings and scanned the 159 reachable websites on 20 published technical criteria. Jeddah posts the highest Arabic coverage of the eight sectors this report series covers — and keeps taking bookings it cannot attribute to anything.
Quick answer
Of 332 Jeddah clinics found on public listings in October 2026, 44% showed no usable website. The 159 scanned websites average 72/100 (median 73). 94% offer Arabic — the highest rate across the eight sector reports in this 2026 series — yet only 75% render it correctly right-to-left. 79% provide an online booking or enquiry path and 60% wire WhatsApp, but just 29% carry a Meta pixel and 20% a TikTok pixel. Median mobile performance is 58%.
The sector in four numbers
- 44%
- of the 332 establishments found on public listings showed no usable website at all
- 72/100
- average technical score across the 159 websites scanned (median 73)
- 57%
- median Lighthouse mobile performance score — Google flags anything under 90%
- 29%
- have a Meta pixel — the rest run (or will run) paid campaigns with no conversion feedback
Collection 2026-10-31, from public listings (OpenStreetMap + Google Maps) — a coverage of publicly listed establishments, not a census. 24 listed websites were unreachable at scan time.
Three findings that matter if you run a clinic in Jeddah
First: Arabic presence is solved here; Arabic rendering is not. 94% of scanned sites offer Arabic — the top rate of the eight sectors in this series — but only 75% pass the right-to-left rendering check: roughly one scanned site in four shows Arabic-speaking patients a broken layout. In Jeddah, having Arabic no longer separates anyone; rendering it properly still does, and it costs no media budget at all.
Second: the sector takes bookings it cannot attribute. 79% of scanned clinics offer an online booking or enquiry path and 60% a WhatsApp contact — the front door works — yet only 29% carry a Meta pixel, 20% a TikTok pixel and 60% GA4. A clinic that fills its calendar without a pixel knows how many bookings arrived; it never learns which ad or which search produced them.
Third: the ceiling sits at 92 and most of the sector is far below it. Median mobile performance is 58% and a quarter of sites fall below 45%; structured data stops at 53% and a map or location link at 47% — for establishments patients travel to in person. 70 of the 159 scanned sites run WordPress and 10 run Next.js: the top-20 table shows what ordinary stacks reach when someone maintains them.
Every criterion, measured across the whole sector
Share of scanned websites passing each check. Where a check could not be taken on a site, that site is excluded from the base — the measured column shows the real base per criterion.
| Criterion | Passing | Measured on |
|---|---|---|
| HTTPS with a valid certificate | 94% | 159 sites |
| Mobile viewport configured | 99% | 159 sites |
| Arabic version present | 94% | 159 sites |
| Arabic rendered right-to-left correctly | 75% | 159 sites |
| Working contact form | 42% | 159 sites |
| Form with client-side validation | 37% | 159 sites |
| Online booking or enquiry path | 79% | 159 sites |
| WhatsApp contact wired | 60% | 159 sites |
| Meta pixel installed | 29% | 159 sites |
| TikTok pixel installed | 20% | 159 sites |
| Google Analytics 4 | 60% | 159 sites |
| Google Tag Manager | 39% | 159 sites |
| Structured data (JSON-LD) | 53% | 159 sites |
| Map / location link | 47% | 159 sites |
Collected 2026-10-31 with the public 20-criteria methodology. Robots.txt exclusions respected (0 sites declined scanning and are not counted).
The top 20, ranked on observable technical facts
The twenty highest-scoring clinic websites in Jeddah at collection time, ranked purely on the published technical criteria.
| # | Website | Score /100 | Perf. | Arabic | Booking path | Meta pixel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | عيادة الدكتور رحاب صيرفي | جلدية تجميل ليزر (drserafi.com) | 92 | 86% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 2 | Pio So Clinics (piosoclinics.com) | 90 | 75% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 3 | الدكتور محمد فادي قولاغاسي - زراعة الاسنان (dr-fadi.com) | 90 | 97% | Yes | Yes | — | — |
| 4 | Al Salama Hospital (alsalamahospital.com) | 88 | 48% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 5 | skin life عيادات سكين لايف (skinlifeksa.com) | 88 | 69% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 6 | عيادات أسنان بطل (bataldental.com) | 88 | 58% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 7 | Orchid Dental - عيادة اوركيد للاسنان (orchiddent.com) | 87 | 83% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 8 | Safwit Almuhaidab Dental Centre (safwatalmuhaideb.com) | 87 | 65% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 9 | Aya Hospital مستشفى آية (ayahospital.com.sa) | 86 | 72% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 10 | BioLife Clinics | عيادات بايولايف (biolifeclinic.sa) | 86 | 96% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 11 | Downtown Medical Clinics عيادات داون تاون الطبية (downtownmc.care) | 86 | 67% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 12 | Dr. Aliaa Abd elTawab - Pediatrics and Neonatology (draliaapeds.netlify.app) | 86 | 99% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 13 | My Clinic (myclinic.com.sa) | 86 | 64% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 14 | SABA Clinics - AL BAWADI عيادات سابا - البوادي (sabamedical.com) | 86 | 52% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 15 | عيادات الجودة – حراء (aljawdahclinics.sa) | 86 | 48% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 16 | عيادة الدكتورة رحاب الحربي | جلدية، تجميل، ليزر (drrehabalharbi.com) | 86 | 70% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 17 | د. محمد السالم | أخصائي تقويم الأسنان (drmohmedalsalem.com) | 85 | 87% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 18 | عيد كلينك | Eed Clinic (eedclinic.com) | 85 | 62% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 19 | AQUA Dent Clinics | عيادات اكوا دنت (aquadentistry.com) | 84 | 91% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 20 | Dr. Talal Qutub Medical Center (talalqutb.online) | 84 | 80% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
Technical measurements of public websites, collected 2026-10-31 — a ranking of websites, not of anyone's services, prices or quality of care. "Perf." is the Lighthouse mobile performance score. Listed and want a re-scan, a correction or removal? One email: the next build honours it.
What this ranking is — and is not
The table above ranks websites, not businesses. Every column is a publicly observable technical fact — page speed, HTTPS, Arabic support, booking paths, measurement tooling — collected by the same scanner, with the same weights, on the same dates, across the entire sector. We make no judgement about anyone's services, prices or quality of care, and a high or low position says nothing about either.
Everything outside the top 20 is anonymised into the sector statistics on this page. Where a measurement could not be taken, we say so rather than estimate it. The full criteria list, weights and scanning rules are public on the methodology page, and any listed business can request a free re-scan, a correction or removal from the named table — we honour all three in the next build.
What the sector builds on
| Platform | Sites | Share of scanned |
|---|---|---|
| WordPress | 70 | 44% |
| Not identifiable from the page | 57 | 36% |
| Next.js | 10 | 6% |
| Drupal | 6 | 4% |
| Wix | 5 | 3% |
| Webflow | 2 | 1% |
Detected from public page signatures (generator tags, asset paths). A custom or hardened build shows as not identifiable — that is not a defect.
Download the PDF summary
Two pages, English and Arabic — the sector numbers, the criteria chart and the top 20, ready to share internally.
Frequently asked questions
Twenty public criteria with published weights — speed, HTTPS, mobile, Arabic support, contact and booking paths, WhatsApp, analytics, ad pixels, structured data, freshness — measured by the same scanner across the whole sector. The methodology page lists every criterion and its weight.
Both take one email. Request your full result through the free audit (you receive the complete bilingual report for your site), or ask for removal from the named table and the next build of this report honours it.
The collection covers establishments visible on public listings (OpenStreetMap and Google Maps) in October 2026 with a working website on file. If your listing had no website — true for a large share of the sector — there was nothing to scan. The free audit works on any URL regardless.
Yes — the scan re-runs periodically and each edition states its collection date. Scores move only when the underlying measurements move.
At 94% coverage, merely having Arabic wins nothing in Jeddah. The measured gaps that make the table are correct right-to-left rendering (75%), working and validated forms (42% and 37%), speed (median 58%) and measurement (29% Meta pixel, 60% GA4) — all listed, with their weights, on the methodology page.
See where your website lands
The free audit runs the same 20 criteria on your site and sends a scored bilingual report within 24 hours — including the three fixes worth doing first.