Sector report — 2026 edition
Jeddah real-estate websites: pages that show property but cannot take a lead
We collected 271 real-estate companies from Jeddah's public listings and scanned the 107 reachable websites on 20 published technical criteria. The result is a sector that localises well, captures almost nothing online, and measures less than any other sector in this report series.
Quick answer
Of 271 Jeddah real-estate companies found on public listings in October 2026, 55% showed no usable website. The 107 scanned sites average 68/100 (median 69), and the best site scores 89 — none reaches 90. Arabic is strong (92%, 75% correct right-to-left), but only 19% offer any online booking or enquiry path and 45% a working contact form. 12% carry a Meta pixel — the lowest rate of the eight sector reports in this series — against 16% with a TikTok pixel: the only segment in the series where TikTok leads Meta.
The sector in four numbers
- 55%
- of the 271 establishments found on public listings showed no usable website at all
- 68/100
- average technical score across the 107 websites scanned (median 69)
- 61%
- median Lighthouse mobile performance score — Google flags anything under 90%
- 12%
- have a Meta pixel — the rest run (or will run) paid campaigns with no conversion feedback
Collection 2026-10-31, from public listings (OpenStreetMap + Google Maps) — a coverage of publicly listed establishments, not a census. 15 listed websites were unreachable at scan time.
Three findings that matter if you sell property in Jeddah
First: the sector shows property but cannot take a lead. 19% of scanned sites offer an online booking or enquiry path — the lowest rate of the eight sectors in this series — 45% a working contact form, 44% a WhatsApp contact and 31% a map or location link. Across most of the sector, a buyer's only options are a phone number or a form that just 37% of sites validate.
Second: measurement is nearly absent — and inverted. 12% carry a Meta pixel, the lowest of the eight reports in this series; 16% a TikTok pixel — the only segment where TikTok sits ahead of Meta; GA4 reaches 47% and GTM 31%. The inversion is unique in the series, but the certain part is simpler: on either platform, the bulk of this sector's paid traffic runs with no conversion feedback.
Third: the top of the table is takeable. No Jeddah real-estate site reaches 90; the best stops at 89. Median mobile performance is 61% — respectable within the series, far under Google's 90% bar — and the stack splits into 43 unidentifiable sites, 42 on WordPress and 12 on Next.js out of 107. Every measurement that makes the leading positions can be replicated by any company in the table.
Every criterion, measured across the whole sector
Share of scanned websites passing each check. Where a check could not be taken on a site, that site is excluded from the base — the measured column shows the real base per criterion.
| Criterion | Passing | Measured on |
|---|---|---|
| HTTPS with a valid certificate | 93% | 107 sites |
| Mobile viewport configured | 97% | 107 sites |
| Arabic version present | 92% | 107 sites |
| Arabic rendered right-to-left correctly | 75% | 106 sites |
| Working contact form | 45% | 107 sites |
| Form with client-side validation | 37% | 107 sites |
| Online booking or enquiry path | 19% | 107 sites |
| WhatsApp contact wired | 44% | 107 sites |
| Meta pixel installed | 12% | 107 sites |
| TikTok pixel installed | 16% | 107 sites |
| Google Analytics 4 | 47% | 107 sites |
| Google Tag Manager | 31% | 107 sites |
| Structured data (JSON-LD) | 49% | 107 sites |
| Map / location link | 31% | 107 sites |
Collected 2026-10-31 with the public 20-criteria methodology. Robots.txt exclusions respected (1 sites declined scanning and are not counted).
The top 20, ranked on observable technical facts
The twenty highest-scoring real-estate websites in Jeddah at collection time, ranked purely on the published technical criteria.
| # | Website | Score /100 | Perf. | Arabic | Booking path | Meta pixel | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raz real estate (razre.sa) | 89 | 95% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 2 | Premium Support Facility Management Ltd. شركة بريميوم سبورت فسيليتي منيجمنت المحدودة (premium-sa.com) | 87 | 77% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 3 | Balahmer Real Estate - بلحمر للتمليك (balahmer.com) | 86 | 93% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
| 4 | شركة بدار العقارية (bdar-sa.com) | 85 | 71% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
| 5 | شركة روشم للتطوير العقاري (roshem.sa) | 85 | 70% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
| 6 | YORKTOWERS JEDDAH (yorktowers.com) | 84 | 51% | Yes | — | Yes | Yes |
| 7 | شركة سهم النموذجية العقارية (sahmalaqaria.com) | 84 | 43% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 8 | SAEED MOHAMMED AL BASSAMI SMB (mahafeth.com.sa) | 83 | 39% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 9 | تمليك النهدي - Alnahdi Real estate (tamlikalnahdi.com) | 83 | 77% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 10 | DASHEN REAL ESTATE (dashen.sa) | 82 | 35% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 11 | ادارة أملاك | برايت هاوس العقارية (brighthouse.sa) | 82 | 61% | Yes | Yes | Yes | — |
| 12 | شركة ايزي هوم العقارية (easyhome.sa) | 82 | 56% | Yes | — | Yes | Yes |
| 13 | كيان الماسيه للتمليك (kian-d.com) | 82 | 42% | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 14 | Elite real estate (elitestrc.com) | 81 | 81% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
| 15 | شركة أزاد العقارية (azad.com.sa) | 81 | 85% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
| 16 | شركة عون المعالي للتطوير و الاستثمار العقاري (awnalmaali.com) | 81 | 82% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
| 17 | أصول جلبان العقارية (jalbanre.com) | 80 | 94% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
| 18 | شركة إتمام الأعمال العقارية (itmam-b.com) | 80 | 79% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
| 19 | SBR Real Estate | اس بي ار العقارية (sbrre.com) | 79 | 50% | Yes | Yes | — | — |
| 20 | مكتب ظلال جدة للعقار (iwtsp.com) | 78 | 89% | Yes | — | Yes | — |
Technical measurements of public websites, collected 2026-10-31 — a ranking of websites, not of anyone's services, prices or quality of care. "Perf." is the Lighthouse mobile performance score. Listed and want a re-scan, a correction or removal? One email: the next build honours it.
What this ranking is — and is not
The table above ranks websites, not businesses. Every column is a publicly observable technical fact — page speed, HTTPS, Arabic support, booking paths, measurement tooling — collected by the same scanner, with the same weights, on the same dates, across the entire sector. We make no judgement about anyone's services, prices or quality of care, and a high or low position says nothing about either.
Everything outside the top 20 is anonymised into the sector statistics on this page. Where a measurement could not be taken, we say so rather than estimate it. The full criteria list, weights and scanning rules are public on the methodology page, and any listed business can request a free re-scan, a correction or removal from the named table — we honour all three in the next build.
What the sector builds on
| Platform | Sites | Share of scanned |
|---|---|---|
| Not identifiable from the page | 43 | 40% |
| WordPress | 42 | 39% |
| Next.js | 12 | 11% |
| Wix | 2 | 2% |
| Starfield Technologies; Go Daddy Website | 1 | 1% |
| Framer ddc5e5f | 1 | 1% |
Detected from public page signatures (generator tags, asset paths). A custom or hardened build shows as not identifiable — that is not a defect.
Download the PDF summary
Two pages, English and Arabic — the sector numbers, the criteria chart and the top 20, ready to share internally.
Frequently asked questions
Twenty public criteria with published weights — speed, HTTPS, mobile, Arabic support, contact and booking paths, WhatsApp, analytics, ad pixels, structured data, freshness — measured by the same scanner across the whole sector. The methodology page lists every criterion and its weight.
Both take one email. Request your full result through the free audit (you receive the complete bilingual report for your site), or ask for removal from the named table and the next build of this report honours it.
The collection covers establishments visible on public listings (OpenStreetMap and Google Maps) in October 2026 with a working website on file. If your listing had no website — true for a large share of the sector — there was nothing to scan. The free audit works on any URL regardless.
Yes — the scan re-runs periodically and each edition states its collection date. Scores move only when the underlying measurements move.
We measure installed pixels, not ad spend: 16% of scanned sites carry a TikTok pixel against 12% with a Meta pixel — the only one of the eight segments in this series where TikTok leads. Whatever the real budget split, 84–88% of the sector runs one platform or the other with no conversion feedback — and that is the fixable part.
See where your website lands
The free audit runs the same 20 criteria on your site and sends a scored bilingual report within 24 hours — including the three fixes worth doing first.